volby 2018 menu
volby 2013 menu
Criminals will be sent to work farms, where they, if they
are healthy enough, will have to work 12 hours a day, 6 days a week and will
undergo extensive behavioral therapy. Hypnosis and other innovative methods
will be used in reprogramming their minds. Part of the 12-hour work schedule
can be used for schooling, should the criminal prefer that. Sentences will
be shorter than they are now. After release they’ll have to wear GPS
tracking bracelets for as long as needed, plus jobs will be available to
Severe sanctions will be imposed on countries that
produce drugs or are conduits for drug trafficking.
Both drug use and distribution will be illegal. Use,
sale, and distribution will be severely punishable, unless the guilty person
leads the police to his or her suppliers.
Drug rehabilitation will include nonstandard methods like
natural detoxification, long term fasting in a controlled environment, blood
transfusions in heroin and similar addictions, and hypnosis.
The media has created an aura among a great part of the
society that drugs are OK, or that they should even be legalized. Don’t
believe such propaganda; get instead to know someone, who believed such
nonsense and now is unable to function properly in our society, has no
motivation to finish college, etc. This disability often continues even
after kicking the habit and detoxification.
Drug glorification by the media, direct or not, must
become severely punishable.
Although one can be happy without drugs, drugs can create
a short term euphoria, but then eventually the effect wears out and life,
when one is not on a high dose, becomes quite miserable. It does not take
long and the euphoria achieved by taking drugs becomes lower than euphoria,
which one can attain without drugs, providing the drugless person has always
Even marijuana is causing brain function changes and the
person, who has experienced with it long enough loses willpower and as a
rule the ability to be successful compared to if he has not ever tried it.
Parents usually don’t learn this until it’s too late.
Schools will teach students effectively how to lead good
Children need to learn discipline, good morals, and job
and life skills.
Audio-visual aids will be used extensively – as well as
visits to various factories, historical sites, museums, live theater
performances, other countries, etc. Lectures and workshops by various
professionals will be given, e.g. by architects, scientists, artists,
psychologists, filmmakers, etc.
Pupils will be separated from an early age on into the
following educational groups – general, art, science, and manual skills.
There should be a worldwide push for English to be
written phonetically; this would be the new English form; learning the old
form would be optional. This will speed up the learning process, especially
in English-speaking countries, by several years. Learning spelling is not
suitable for the youngest pupils; eliminating the archaic spelling drills
would make studies more interesting and a lot less boring than they are now.
Pronunciation of American English particularly is
changing with speed of talk. Proper, slow-talked English should be used in
the phonetically written form.
One type of English must become the international
language standard – it should be either British or American English.
There are many types of phonetic alphabets used by
different dictionaries. One that will be the simplest to write will be
created. Hooks, accent marks, etc. over vowels could be used to distinguish
the various shades of pronunciation, just as they are used in Czech and
Dual-alphabet signs and publications, “phonetic” and
“archaic”, will be used until the phonetic written form of English becomes
Religious rights must be guaranteed, but not for
religions and groups, which worship the devil and those that brainwash their
members to serve not God, but their crooked religious leaders.
If one believes in evolution he or she should try to
think about genetic coding of cells. The genetic code is a program –
firmware – which certainly appears to have been created. Most refer to this
creator as God.
Religion plays an important role in our modern society.
The kids especially are nowadays exposed to wrong role models, bad ethics,
early sex, and STD’s (sexually transmitted diseases). If they would be
religious, they would have a preprogrammed guidance in their mind to
recognize what is good and right and what is wrong. This belief system can
guard them to a great extent from catching an STD, from drugs, and crime,
etc. It allows them to fight peer pressure that could turn out to be
disastrous. In today’s society a child needs every crutch he can get.
Religion is the strongest crutch.
A religious adult has a comfort knowing that a better
world awaits him after death. Basically, you do not have to believe in God,
but if you look at the world around you, you must for sure notice that your
kids, if they were believers, would benefit greatly. Even if the world would
become all good, religion still has a positive impact on one’s psyche.
There are negative aspects associated with some
religions. The extremely powerful Catholic Church has a quite dark past,
which spans from the medieval times all the way to WW2. If you don’t believe
it, check the Internet, read books about the Jesuit order, etc. You will
learn something quite different than is the official church’ propaganda.
Catholic Church has not cut itself from these ghosts fully. One needs to
study history and politics of the church to understand the power structure,
to know why Pope has the absolute power, why the church has such
conservative outlook on the world, as well as why it has some rules that
make no sense. It has little to do with religion, bible, or Jesus.
There were always liberal movements within the
church, movements by priests who studied the bible and interpreted it
differently than the conservative Jesuits, with their thrust for power.
In Vatican Council of 1870 was a vote about Papal Infallibility. At that
time there were 917 dioceses. Dioceses are administered by bishops.
Participants of only 433 dioceses voted for the infallibility of Pope.
Many of those who voted were not even bishops; 4/5 were Italians.
Because of this vote, the church has until now been able to crush
progressive movements within itself, has not modernized, has not
reformed, teaches archaic doctrines that feed its power-hunger, does not
allow use modern birth-control methods, is against abortions, does not
allow priests to marry, etc. These doctrines, which have nothing to do
with bible, are often responsible for suffering among the poor, because
they help create large poor families, however they serves well the
church’ drive for power, as they help to create more members, which
support the political candidates that the church wants them to.
As the vote of 1870 was highly questionable
legal-wise, considering Catholic Church’ internal governing at that
time, and because basically the vote only represented desires of the
conservative Italian section of the church, the Popes and the Jesuits
order have no real mandate to keep the Church and its teachings so
archaic, so remote from progress, so remote from modern times. It has no
right to suppress progressive movements within the church.
What is needed is for the progressive priests that do
not agree with these incorrect doctrines is to establish a new parallel
Catholic Church, which would be truer to the bible, truer to how Jesus
wanted religion to be, would cut itself from the church’ dark past and
would take into consideration the modern era environment. This is also
needed in order so that the church becomes a lot more popular,
especially among young people. The old Catholic Church has to meanwhile
take a look at its archaic teachings, at the lacking mandate for its
conservatism, its incorrect approach to bible interpretation, and it
should reform itself, eventually rejoining with the new progressive
Catholic movement and eventually even main Protestants movements. There
is no reason why bible has to be interpreted differently by the
Catholics than it is by other, less power hungry churches.
All politicians will agree to fight for clean unpolluted
environment and healthy, nutritious, live foods, not chemical nutrition that
is responsible for disease, obesity, and genetic damages. All nations must
cooperate in making our planet Earth, which is our home, a beautiful and
healthy place to be born, to live happy lives, grow old, and eventually die
from an old age, not from a disease.
During the Reagan’s era, going by the market economy
principles, where everyone needs to take care of himself and no one should
rely on the state, STD controls became more or less eliminated. Prior to
that, when someone became infected with an STD, the transmission chain was
traced and everyone in this chain was treated. What resulted from the Reagan
administration’s move is that most people in the US are now infected with an
incurable STD. We now have, in the US, areas with epidemics of incurable
deadly gonorrhea, incurable deadly syphilis, incurable deadly tuberculosis,
and naturally communities, where most people already died of AIDS. It is
absolutely clear that the current policies are wrong and that strict STD and
infectious disease controls must be established. Check this site:
In Eastern Europe infectious diseases were extremely well
under control. In Czechoslovakia there was a strong push to eliminate them
before WW2, during WW2, and after WW2, until the Communist regime fell and
controls became laxed or removed. As a result these diseases are quickly
moving to the awful levels that now exist in the US.
When it comes to health, one cannot
rely on doctors to help him stay healthy – and on supermarkets to buy
healthy foods. Doctors are taught to provide crisis medicine. They are
excellent at that. Supermarket sell you chemical nutrition, because it is
easier to produce, store, and as a result less expensive to sell. You need
to look at your body as a complex chemical instrument that needs proper
ingredients to function properly, or it will break down and fail. You need
to feed it with the ingredients, which are right for it! You get these in
natural organic foods. If you have a garden, grow your own!
- You should also
have your thyroid examined, especially if you carry extra weight. In
countries and areas located far from the ocean, iodine substitution in the
form of sea plant supplementation, like kelp, is highly recommended, unless
of course you have some condition that would prevent you from doing so.
- Stay away from
sweets as much as you can. If you crave them, you could have a hypoglycemia,
a condition that the orthodox medicine does not really recognize as a
disease or knows how to treat. Slowly withdrawing from eating sweets, under
doctor’s supervision, is highly recommended. You may get withdrawal
symptoms, but eventually you should feel considerably better overall.
multivitamins, extra vitamin C, and drink a lot of water.
- List of
recommended health books is in the last chapter.
There is an important energy factor that has been ignored
by the lighting industry. The factor is color of the light source (lamp),
which is referred to as color temperature and is measured in degrees Kelvin.
Generally, the higher is this temperature, the higher is visual efficiency.
Lower color temperature makes light more reddish; higher one more bluish.
It's been known for decades that white-colored light can
be up to several times more efficient than the pinkish and yellowish one
(high and low pressure sodium lighting), with its low color temperature,
which is used worldwide in outdoor applications. The lighting designers,
unfortunately, go by guidelines of engineering societies, which make
recommendations on what type of lighting is to be used. These societies are
highly staffed by engineers who receive paychecks from lighting
manufacturers that make bigger profits with the inefficient pinkish and
yellowish lighting, which eventually, as a result, ends up on our streets.
Because the only real interest corporations have is to
make more profits, proper engineering recommendations are not made and so
billions of dollars are wasted and too many people die or are seriously
injured in accidents due to this improper lighting, which is officially
considered to be “the correct one”.
This less efficient lighting wastes energy, is
responsible for increased dependency on foreign oil, and as a result our
environment becomes unnecessarily more polluted.
Incorrect lighting, although showing the same light
levels as a correct one, can be up to 10-times, in some cases up to
100-times more inefficient than a correctly designed one, due to various
factors, like color temperature, color spectrum, pupil-factor, veiling
reflections, and direct glare.
Dr. Berman is one of the scientists who explained effect
of the color temperature phenomenon on visual efficiency. If someone wants
to know more, I recommend papers by this researcher on experiments he has
done at the Lawrence Berkley Laboratory in California. Other scientists too
have for decades been coming out with similar results, at various lighting
A number of tests also indicate that the more efficient
full spectrum white light is healthier than the warm and cool white lighting
that has for decades dominated in the US. These tests were done both in the
West and in Soviet Union.
Another factor is that people do not have corrected
vision, therefore higher than necessary lighting levels are needed in order
to help the eyes focus better. That is why free medical care can play a very
positive role even in energy conservation. Free eye examinations and glasses
decrease accidents, improve work performance, and can indirectly lower our
dependence on foreign oil.
Foreign-born individuals who lack technical schooling and
proper training very often design lighting systems in the US. It suits fine
the lighting industry and the electric utilities. The less efficient the
system is, the more lights are needed, more energy will be used, and more
money will be made. Their concern with efficiency is excluding main elements
of the whole picture.
Universities and research organizations generally receive
their funds from the industry and so for every experiment that demonstrates
importance of color, come other experiments, done by the industry financed
scientists, which prove otherwise.
Lighting has been used as an example. Energy can be saved
in many other ways.
Nicola Tesla, one of two greatest minds in history of
mankind (the other one was Leonardo DaVinci), studied at Prague’s Charles
University, where he came from his native Yugoslavia, and at Paris’
Sorbonne. When he was to develop inexpensive energy, his sponsor, a US oil
industry magnate J. P. Morgan cut off his funds and his large Denver
laboratories were locked up. When he died, FBI entered his home and
confiscated all his writings.
Until now we celebrate Thomas Edison,
not Nicola Tesla. Actually Edison was much less of an inventor than Tesla,
who even refused to share a Nobel Prize with Edison. While Edison’s main
driving force was money, money meant nothing to Tesla. Despite the fact that
Tesla’s alternating current (AC), was much more efficient for energy
transmission, the US Congress outlawed it in the US at a time when Edison
tried to use his direct current (DC) to inefficiently light up the New
We must teach people, our kids especially, to be good, have empathy, to enjoy
arts and culture, and at the same time strive for better future. This desire
must be programmed into everyone’s mind. Arts and culture make people better,
more sensitive human beings. Money does the opposite. Our world would be a lot
better, a lot more peaceful, if people would have more noble goals than the
primitive ones to be rich and powerful.
The average film
Hollywood studios make costs about $60,000,000 (USD), plus promotion costs –
e.g. $15.000.000. This makes a total of some $75,000,000. At least one-third of
that could be saved – from the outrageous star payments and promotion costs.
Advertising expenses need to be replaced by Internet surveys of what different
types of viewers think of the film. These different viewer groups could be e.g.
film artists, parents, kids, romantic comedy lovers, etc., etc. Also posted on
the same web site would be what critics have to say. The critics too would be
rated, by filmmakers, and by the critics’ readers. Currently reviews are written
by critics for magazines, newspapers, TV, etc. and are placed in the same media
as studio and theater ads for the same films. As media make money from these
ads, critics must write reviews in such a way, as to help the studios, which pay
for the ads, otherwise the studios would instead advertise with their
competition. As ads will be the way of the past, the critics would be free to
write true reviews. It would be seriously punishable for anyone accepting or
giving favors in order to create a favorable review. This type of arrangement
would make the critics honest, which is what the current system to a great
Portion of the 25 million per movie saved
would be used to buy movie production equipment, 3D type included, that would be
available to independent filmmakers for rent at an absolute minimum cost, so
they would no longer have to pay outrageous rental fees for their tools.
Admission costs would be increased on junk films, which is most of what
Hollywood now produces – films which educate us and our kids the wrong way.
Admission costs on films that teach violence, perverse sex, wrong morals, etc.
will be up much higher than admission to see enriching films. These would be
subsidized from ticket sales of the junk films. Good movies will cost little to
see; Hollywood junk will cost much more than it does now. Theaters will make the
same per-ticket-money on the low-cost tickets as on tickets for the expensive
People will be able to choose between as many genres as they can today. Quality
of films will not be decreased, only enhanced with art, culture, and educational
ingredients. As a result kids’ minds will be getting programmed in the right
direction. Children will no longer crave so much to see blood and violence and
would not be exposed to profanity. They would eventually learn to hate these
things. The studios would be forced to make a lot better films; they would
respond extremely fast. The ones who would not be able to compete in this new
environment do not belong to our society. Independent filmmakers, who are now
disadvantaged by the studios, would be able to compete in a much healthier
used film as an example. TV programming, CD’s, and events like concerts and live
theater would use similar tools to get the system moving in the right direction
and to educate our kids and us to be good, not bad.
No commercials or any form of advertising will be present anywhere in film or
television. People should enjoy a film or TV program, should not be bombarded
with unrelated propaganda. We should learn some good things even from the
Communists, not just discard everything they did, or do, as being bad.